Existentialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Existentialism - Essay Example1. Abstract Summary or overview of the paper 2. Introduction An expository and informative pro and cons of existential philosophy 3. Arguments in support of existentialism 4. Criticism or arguments against existentialism 5. Conclusion. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to to a lower placescore the argument for and against existentialism. Even though advocates of existentialism lament that philosophy should begin with individual thinking which is the cornerstone of his or her existence, its also prudent to state that individual morals as well(p) as reason and experience does not alone define the true character and origin of a person. This is the thesis of this philosophical movement. The experience one under goes determines the resultant character of that person until that person absurdly perishes. These are among other things that the author explores to understand more somewhat existentialism. The paper is divided into an abstract, as a summary of the authors intended re hunting goals, introduction of the topic arguments for and against existentialism and a conclusion of the findings. The author concludes that there is no specific rendering of existentialism but it is merely a bundle of ideas that tries to marry Christianity and atheism. It is therefore, a quasi-human secularism philosophy divided into Atheist and theist existentialism. This marriage has so far accredited considerable criticisms and the writer agrees that it does not justify the philosophical means attached to it. The rationale supporting is that existentialism is more inclined to secular humanism that Christianity and consequently theism existentialism has no place in this human philosophy. Introduction The term existentialism is an idealistic doctrine which appeals to individual freedom and certificate of indebtedness in ascertain personal actions and motivations. It rests upon the presupposition that essence precedes existence (Sartre 387). Once ma n appears on the scene, he determines his existence (Sartre 388). This philosophy is strongly opposed to the traditionalistic thinking that in search for truth, man appeals rationalism plus empiricism yet you cannot divorce reason and experience from philosophical and human development. These two brains development are sarcastically do and have much origin in theism than existentialism. Whereas existentialists developed their thinking based on reason together with experience, all these are a cornerstone of traditional theism. It is agreeable that reason plus experience have linkages with theistic existentialism. And whereas it presupposes that the scientific plus moral ideas cannot sufficiently explain human existence without individual native responsibility, collective responsibility cannot also be ignored either. Accordingly, it is a self-descriptive thinking theory of determining ones own way of life and responsibility than the will of external thinking or force motivated by m oral values. Besides, it negatives the rule of law in society which is divisionary because society without rule on law is a dead society, undemocratic and ungovernable. These advocates are morally dead men looking of moralists to devour. However, this is the ideal of reason, empiricism and freedom to effectively think about what is right and wrong, which are typical moral virtues. Its a philosophy with no definite definition but its meaning is gathered from the ideas and classical illustrations of philosophers much(prenominal) as